AN EVALUATION OF THE WAR ON ISIS
The
military situation on the ground in the war against the ISIS looks
less favorable to Abu Bakr al Baghdadi than it did in the recent
past. Both on the Syrian front, where they have lost about 22% of
territory under their control, 8% only in the lat three months,
and on the Iraqi front, where they gave up 40%, the Islamic
militias are on the retreat. What worries the caliph is not the
loss of territory, but the lack of access to the resources that
fuel the survival of his organization.
The smuggling of oil has seen a drop in revenues of 40%, the
supplies of weapons, ammunitions, the influx of volunteers have
all become increasingly difficult. In this respect, the situation
is becoming critical, as some escapees have confirmed. After all,
it was logical that an increase in the forces fighting against the
Islamic State would have led to a downfall of the Islamist
militias. The question is merely how long until they are totally
defeated.
An international coalition
There are presently 65 countries that, with varying degrees of
involvement, are contrasting the ISIS. There are about 7 thousand
Russians in Syria, including regiments of Spetsnaz, about 50
aircrafts, helicopters and tanks. Around 4.500 US troops station
in Iraq, both with special forces and trainers. Then there are the
Iraqi Kurdish Peshmerga, the Syrian Kurdish YPG, the Yazidi and
Christian militias, the Shia volunteers, the Hezbollah and the
Iranian Pasdaran, plus the Iraqi and Syrian armies. It doesn't
come as a surprise that the least significant contribution is from
Arab countries.
Warplanes from France, United States, Jordan, Canada, Australia
and, following the attacks in Brussels, Belgium, Netherlands and
United Kingdom bombard both in Syria and Iraq. Fighter jets from
Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Russia target the
ISIS in Syria, while Denmark only flies over Iraq. According to
the US, over the past nine months aerial strikes have eliminated
around 10 thousand enemy combatants.
International inter-forces commands have been established in
Damascus, Baghdad and Amman to coordinate the efforts against the
Islamist militias. It is also significant that the war against the
ISIS has helped overcome a series of international hurdles: the
Russians communicate with the Israelis to avoid incidents, the
Americans work hand in hand with the Russians to support the YPG,
Iranians, Americans and Russians consult each other on the way
forward in Iraq and so on.
The control over the airspace has been crucial. The ISIS doesn't
have an aviation; they can rely on 6 airplanes that are grounded
due to lack of maintenance, pilots and because they would surely
be destroyed as soon as they take off. The weakness in the air is
balanced by a strength on the ground, where the Islamic State is
definitely more effective because its fighters are ready to die
for the cause. They have recently been capable of flying drones
for recognition missions over Iraq, but they have been incapable
of arming them.
The turning point
The progressive defeat of the ISIS has coincided with the Russian
support to Bashar al Assad. Since September 2015, a number of
commanders from the Islamic State have been targeted and
eliminated. It was the case of the commander of military ops in
Syria, Abu Omar al Shishani, the Red Emir, whose real name was
Tarkhan Batirashvili, or Abu Sayyaf, in charge of the oil sector,
and Abu Ala al Afri, al Baghdadi's deputy and responsible of the
group's finances. The targeting of the leaders of the ISIS by the
US has been possible thanks to an improved intelligence. This
usually means that the security apparatus of the militants is
showing some cracks. Someone is now starting to talk or
collaborate.
The military might of the ISIS is directly proportional to the
influx of volunteers from across the globe. The United Nations
estimates that there are about 30 thousand Foreign Fighters.
3/3.500 are Europeans, half of them French, around one hundred
Americans, 2.500 Russian (4.700 if we also add those coming from
former Soviet republics), and thousands of Arabs, mainly Tunisians
(6.000), Saudis (2.500), Jordanians and Turks. This is more than
double the amount of foreign fighters that went to Afghanistan.
This influx is influenced by the evolution of the conflict and by
the role played by neighboring countries. Now that Turkey seems to
have closed its gates, the traffic to and from Syria has been
reduced. Since the beginning of the caliphate, around 28 thousand
militants have been killed.
Abu Omar al Shishani
How the fight will evolve
Does this imply that Islamic terrorism is heading towards a sound
defeat? The answer is no. Both because the ISIS fights a
non-conventional warfare with terrorist attacks, kamikazes and
guerrilla, and also because its struggle is fueled by the
fanaticism of those who believe in a religious conflict.
The strength of the ISIS is not only in the control of territory –
although this was al Baghdadi's initial objective – but rather in
preventing others from controlling it. If and when the Islamic
State is ousted from Raqqa, it will revert to its main tactic of
organizing terrorist attacks across the world. We've had some
blatant examples in the past months. As a matter of fact, there is
a direct correlation between the military defeats of the caliphate
and the exponential growth of attacks elsewhere. This is mainly a
psychological need to boost the morale of the fighters on the
ground. But there is also a practical necessity linked to the fact
that the ISIS doesn't have enough forces to control a vast amount
of territory and cannot sustain a war of attrition.
Furthermore, the attacks abroad are generally organized by
extremists that have returned home from their experience in Syria
or Iraq. An estimated 15% of foreign fighters go back to their
countries of origin, while 10% die in combat. This has been
possible thanks to the access to both the printing machines that
produce Syrian passports and the personal data registry of the
Syrian population.
This shift in strategies is particularly evident in Iraq, where it
is relatively simple to exploit the sectarian divide between Sunni
and Shia. The ISIS stages its attacks away from the combat zones
and inside Baghdad. The Iraqi army is even thinking about building
a fortified trench around the Iraqi capital to control the access
to the city. In January 2016, 1.320 Iraqis were killed in
terrorist attacks, 1.090 in February; around a quarter of these
victims were in the Iraqi capital.
Haider al Abadi
The Iraqi test
The fate of the ISIS will be determined by the efficacy of the
Iraqi army. After having fled from Mosul and Ramadi in 2013 and
giving up the two cities to the Islamic State, and after retaking
Ramadi and Tikrit in 2015 with the help of Shia volunteers,
Baghdad's army is now preparing to attack Mosul.
With the help of the Kurdish Pershmerga, supported and trained by
the Americans, the Iraqi will have to regain the control of a city
of two million people and a symbol of the conquests of the ISIS.
Just like Raqqa in Syria, Mosul has a high symbolic value. It
won't be easy to chase out al Baghdadi's men whom, in urban
centers, can sustain a fight against forces that outnumber them
and are better equipped. The US is training the Iraqi army to face
a guerrilla war inside the city.
The tactics of the ISIS have already been tested in Ramadi. They
will disseminate traps and mines, exploit tunnels and underground
passages, use suicide bombers that will strike against the enemy
front lines with armored trucks loaded with explosives, they will
hide among the civilian population and use it as human shields.
The Islamic States will go for a flexible defense, avoid high
intensity direct clashes and carry out small counter-offensives,
with the ultimate aim of gaining time and lose small portions of
territory at a time.
The outcome of the fight in Mosul will also be linked to the
behavior of the local majority Sunni population, that is generally
hostile to the government in Baghdad. Put in a tight spot, the
ISIS might resort to using chemical weapons, as it did in June
2015 against the YPG in Hasaka. The atrocities committed over the
years by al Baghdadi's militias leave no room for surrender.
The Iraqi Prime Minister, Haider al Abadi, claims that the ISIS
will be totally defeated in 2016. This is definitely an optimistic
prevision. The issue is not wiping out al Baghdadi and his
militants, but rather diminishing the appeal of the ideology that
goes with the Islamic State. Unfortunately, a so-called caliphate
has ruled over a territory for almost 3 years, with its law,
victories and conquests under the flag of Islam. This has such a
fascination for many that the appeal that once belonged to Al
Qaeda is now owned by the ISIS. Terrorism needs to be defeated on
the ideological and theological front. And only Islamic nations
can contribute to its downfall. If they intend to do so, of
course.