KIDNAPPINGS: THE ACTIVITIES OF A 007
Silvia Costanza Romano
The
case of the kidnapping of the Italian aid-worker Silvia Costanza
Romano, which took place in Kenya on November 20, 2018, raises the
issue of what is the procedure to be followed for such cases.
There are two main actors: the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the
External Information and Security Agency (AISE). The first
operates through the embassy in the country where the event takes
place and, in this case, out of Nairobi. Instead, AISE works
through its local representative.
Both structures operate, as it should be, in coordination with
each other. Two channels are activated respectively:
- the embassy turns to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to
sensitize the counterpart on the Italian government's concern for
the safety of its compatriot;
- the representative of the Intelligence Services, in this case
the Bureau Chief, does the same with his local counterpart,
specifically the Kenyan National Intelligence Service, monitoring
on the ground what the other party has implemented. Investigations
are carried out by the Kenyan police who carries out the probe,
mans checkpoints or carries out arrests. The result of this
activity is continuously communicated to the Italian authorities
on the spot.
Two different sets of responsibilities
Although both Italian bodies are important in their dialogue with
local institutions, once the Kenyan authorities have been
sensitized by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, they have
played their role almost completely. The ambassador will remain in
continuous contact with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs both in
Rome and in Nairobi, he will certainly ask for and obtain a
meeting with the Kenyan Interior Minister. He will also be the
spokesperson for those Italian investigative bodies working with
the local Ministry of Justice. He will also be able to activate
and solicit the honorary consul of Malindi, who is territorially
competent in the light of where the abduction occurred, the
village of Chakama. The same will be possible with the other
honorary consul in Mombasa who works in the coastal area of
Kenya.
But the operational part, the one that refers to all the
initiatives that can be implemented to free the hostage, it falls
on the Bureau Chief of the AISE. It is he who continually
converses with the local Services, it is he who establishes a
direct contact with the police, he is the one who is entitled to
provide operational suggestions to the other party, to advise
against any operations that are too dangerous, to solicit useful
initiatives during the investigations. It is still he who acts as
an intermediary between the Italian investigative departments, in
this case the ROS (Special Operational Grouping of the
Carabinieri), and the local security organizations. It is not
interference, obviously it cannot go beyond the limits of
insistence, but certainly what he says "must" be considered.
The
AISE logo
The
arms of the Bureau Chief
The Bureau Chief, or rather the one that performs his job well,
certainly has an excellent relationship with the National
Intelligence Service and this means that the collaboration of the
counterpart is not only out of duty, but also out of
participation. The Bureau Chief is a bit like the ambassador of
AISE in the country, when he speaks he does so on behalf of his
Director in Rome and therefore enjoys consideration, perhaps not
in public, equal to that of his counterpart of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, the Ambassador.
If he does well, he will have had the time and opportunity to get
to know influential local individuals, he will also have the
opportunity to lobby his requests with the benefit of these
contacts. For obvious reasons of contiguity between the respective
jobs in the security field, generally the Chief of Police is one
of these.
Another area where AISE develops personal relationships is that of
the Italian community residing in Kenya. It is a numerically
consistent community and, in this specific case, it has very
qualified people inserted in the local social fabric. An
awareness-raising activity can also be carried out through these
links.
Certainly a lever that can be used with Intelligence Services in
this type of bilateral relationship are training courses, an
official invitation from the Director to visit Italy, the supply
of materials or equipment. These are gestures of consideration
that, when applied to the Agencies of developing countries, such
as Kenya, have a very high positive spillover coefficient.
A possible negotiation for the release
Although officially government authorities always deny the payment
of a ransom, the reality is that when the life or safety of a
hostage is at stake, Italy is among those countries that is
willing to negotiate for its release. It happened widely in Iraq.
It happened recently in Syria.
Obviously it is an activity that takes place secretly with
(preferably) or without the assistance of local security forces.
In this case the first problem is to find the interlocutor who
speaks on behalf of the kidnappers. The second is to evaluate its
reliability. In other words, the contractual power at its disposal
must be verified. And it must obviously provide evidence that it
actually has access to the hostage.
A good part of this activity is always the responsibility of the
local Bureau, even if certainly other agents from the Main Office
are also involved in the operation. Any negotiation is extremely
delicate, generally the ransom is paid in a third country, the
timings of the release of the hostage and the payment of the
ransom must be well coordinated, other intermediaries are often
involved and of which the Bureau Chief probably doesn’t know the
identity. And when there is money and there is a person's life
involved it is good that more people evaluate the initiatives,
take responsibility, make the right decisions.
The Bureau and other Intelligence Agencies
In the country in which he resides, the Bureau Chief also develops
contacts with his counterparts of other Intelligence Agencies that
operate just like he does. These are contacts that are created in
the context of common acquaintances, it is also part of that
empathy that brings people who do the same job together and maybe
share the same risks.
A Bureau Chief will get to know these colleagues sooner or later,
also because identifying them for security purposes is part of his
job. He must know under what cover they act, how they are
introduced into the local social fabric, what they do and what
they look for in their nation's informational priorities.
Generally, intelligence agencies, whether friends or foes, do not
share information or news, do not carry out joint operations, nor
can they be deemed reliable when they share info with you. But,
when there is an event like the one that sees the kidnapping of an
Italian aid-worker, there is some degree of solidarity. This is so
also because the line between crime and terrorism (and the latter
affects everyone), in an area close to the border with Somalia, is
always very thin. Simply put, we help each other, we give
ourselves a hand, we share specific news. It is no longer an
intelligence problem with often competing roles, but something
different.
In Kenya are deployed the representatives of several Intelligence
Services, and some of them are very important. Perhaps the CIA
representative could be asked (both from the Main Office in Rome
but also from the Bureau Chief) for support in wiretapping, the
use of a drone to locate the kidnappers' hideout considering the
massive American presence in Djibouti.
The
Italian Foreign Ministry in Rome
What
happens in Rome
While agents work on the field in Kenya, emergency units are set
up in Rome to follow the event. As regards the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, there is a Crisis Unit which operates mainly in these
types of emergencies. It is the structure that dialogues with the
ambassador in Nairobi and interfaces with the relatives of the
kidnapped aid-worker back in Italy. The Unit continuously
communicates the evolution of the investigative activity.
But still in Italy, even AISE has its own Operations Room which
follows the world's most important security events around the
clock. For the kidnapping of Silvia Costanza Romano this structure
has certainly activated a specific desk. All information of
interest is communicated to the Italian Prime Minister or to the
Undersecretary with responsibility for the Services (AISE depends
on the Presidency of the Council of Ministers) through the DIS
(Department for Information and Security), which coordinates the
activity both of the AISE and the AISI, or, if authorized,
directly. The government is therefore continuously informed on the
evolution of the case.
If news of interest emerges on the conditions of the compatriot or
on the evolution of the investigations, these can be supplied from
the AISE also to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to be brought to
the knowledge of the relatives.
Useful synergies
Whatever information the Bureau Chief acquires in Nairobi is
transmitted directly to Rome and, if there are no
contraindications, it is a good rule that the ambassador is also
informed at a later date. The same should, indeed "must" happen in
the opposite direction. Synergies are useful to ensure that we
avoid overlaps of initiatives, waste of resources that would
otherwise be put to better use. Also because, in the end, both the
Bureau Chief and the Ambassador need to be informed respectively
and act accordingly. It may also happen that either one of them,
in a specific moment of the awareness-raising activity, needs the
other.
The results
It is clear that, as effective as the awareness-raising activity
of the Ambassador or the intervention of the Bureau Chief may be,
the success or failure of the activity of the Intelligence
Services depends on the investigative capability of the latter.
The hunt for kidnappers and the eventual release of the hostage,
whose been in the hands of criminals for months, is however also
linked to a number of activities which are largely hidden, to a
series of characters who move about in the shadows and who will
eventually contribute, together with local police, to the ultimate
success. Characters, as in the case of the local Bureau Chief, who
do not have a face or a name and who once everything is hopefully
successful, will not even have the right satisfaction of being
cited to Italian public opinion.